PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.59%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 9698.HK's 6.50%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.77%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
11.19%
Positive EBIT growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.99%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 9698.HK's 13.51%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
2.96%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.05%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
137.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
20.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-1635.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1635.22%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-472.61%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
40.98%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
40.98%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-47.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.92%
Positive short-term equity growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.90%
Inventory is declining while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
22.86%
Asset growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 7.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.75%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
55.56%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.81%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.