PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.51%
Negative revenue growth while 9698.HK stands at 6.50%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.00%
Negative gross profit growth while 9698.HK is at 6.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.58%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.81%
Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 13.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.73%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-16.72%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-16.72%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 9698.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-100.83%
Negative OCF growth while 9698.HK is at 10.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-98.73%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-0.74%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-0.74%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
27.28%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-1641.60%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1641.60%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-512.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-41.30%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-41.30%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-48.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.67%
Positive short-term equity growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6193.74%
Our AR growth while 9698.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
28.40%
Inventory growth of 28.40% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.51%
Negative asset growth while 9698.HK invests at 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.85%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
6.85%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.