PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.55%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
38.08%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
22.49%
Positive EBIT growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
49.28%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 13.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
40.65%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
40.50%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
122.20%
OCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
121.23%
Positive FCF growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
177.03%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
181.02%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
77.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
584.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
610.53%
Positive OCF/share growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
4.46%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.11%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
23.10%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-28.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.38%
Positive short-term equity growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.78%
Our AR growth while 9698.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-24.78%
Inventory is declining while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
17.30%
Asset growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 7.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.98%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
32.21%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 8.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.03%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.