PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.22%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
9.63%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.96%
Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 13.51%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.57%
Positive net income growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.48%
Positive EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while 9698.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
78.89%
OCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
83.21%
Positive FCF growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
106.29%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
4.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
987.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 9698.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
505.43%
Positive OCF/share growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-17.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
27.31%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-52.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-46.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.39%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
15.35%
Positive short-term equity growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
Our AR growth while 9698.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-24.05%
Inventory is declining while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.85%
Negative asset growth while 9698.HK invests at 7.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.70%
Positive BV/share change while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.96%
We’re deleveraging while 9698.HK stands at 8.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.16%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.