PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-4.36%
Negative gross profit growth while 9698.HK is at 7.25%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 167.86%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-93.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-92.97%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-92.97%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share change of 0.02% while 9698.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Dividend reduction while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
168.26%
OCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 9.59%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
178.21%
FCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 42.90%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
94.34%
10Y CAGR of 94.34% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
24.60%
5Y CAGR of 24.60% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
-18.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2219.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 2219.76% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
254.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 254.07% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
251.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 251.10% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-89.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.51%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-92.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
Equity/share CAGR of 30.64% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
13.11%
Equity/share CAGR of 13.11% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 9698.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-10.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while 9698.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
13.59%
Inventory growth of 13.59% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
10.10%
Asset growth of 10.10% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
0.18%
BV/share growth of 0.18% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
1.47%
Debt growth of 1.47% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.