PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while 9698.HK stands at 7.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while 9698.HK is at 5.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 9698.HK's 10.00%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth under 50% of 9698.HK's 4035.44%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
335.95%
FCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-81.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 609.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-85.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 609.41%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-87.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 99.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
7.81%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 9698.HK's 997.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-69.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 997.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 1525.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.58%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-112.88%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
99.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
25.56%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 1031.13%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.89%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 1031.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.36%
Below 50% of 9698.HK's 253.18%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
49.39%
Inventory growth of 49.39% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.11%
Asset growth well under 50% of 9698.HK's 31.18%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.07%
We have a declining book value while 9698.HK shows 57.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.77%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 4.76%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A growth well above 9698.HK's 11.08%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.