Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 9698.HK stands at 9.26%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 9698.HK is at 10.84%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 21.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while 9698.HK is at 1601.32%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 9698.HK is at 34.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 584.94%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 100.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 200.43%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Below 50% of 9698.HK's 5265.14%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 1458.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 79.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 1069.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 218.67%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Inventory is declining while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.

Negative asset growth while 9698.HK invests at 7.11%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.