Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 9698.HK stands at 6.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 9698.HK is at 6.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative operating income growth while 9698.HK is at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 9698.HK stands at 2.83%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 9698.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Negative FCF growth while 9698.HK is at 31.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 801.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 159.76%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 80.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 1204.48%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 643.44%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 149.90%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 9698.HK stands at 925.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 203.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 203.74%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Inventory growth of 407.97% while 9698.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.

Negative asset growth while 9698.HK invests at 11.17%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

SG&A growth well above 9698.HK's 8.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.