PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-42.78%
Negative revenue growth while 9698.HK stands at 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
77.20%
Positive gross profit growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-25.15%
Negative net income growth while 9698.HK stands at 47.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-18.18%
Negative EPS growth while 9698.HK is at 47.83%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-18.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK is at 47.83%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.00%
Share reduction while 9698.HK is at 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
123.88%
OCF growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 57.70%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
123.76%
Positive FCF growth while 9698.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-93.25%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 885.32%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-93.14%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 177.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-58.39%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 58.77%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
120.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 9698.HK's 2556.85%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-91.36%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK is at 4003.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-73.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 9698.HK stands at 880.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-299.67%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-4.68%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 9698.HK is 11.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-585.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-20.51%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 9698.HK stands at 903.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.42%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 213.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-26.46%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 9698.HK is at 82.09%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.78%
Our AR growth while 9698.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-90.78%
Inventory is declining while 9698.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-9.38%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-9.37%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
129.55%
Debt growth far above 9698.HK's 2.47%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.40%
We expand SG&A while 9698.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.