PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.72%
Revenue growth of 24.72% while PONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
-76.02%
Negative gross profit growth while PONY is at 68.52%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-56.61%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-38.79%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-32.52%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-32.52%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Slight or no buybacks while PONY is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-94.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-72.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-8.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-312.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-557.81%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
20.57%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 20.57% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
-55.77%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-54.84%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-48.30%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.61%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.92%
We have a declining book value while PONY shows 1.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-34.53%
We’re deleveraging while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
97.32%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PONY's 62.37%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.37%
SG&A growth of 3.37% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.