PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PONY's 53.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
100.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PONY's 49.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
100.00%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
100.00%
Positive operating income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative OCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-1.42%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-1.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-1.42%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-234.05%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-234.05%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-234.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
34.13%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PONY's 63.21%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
34.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PONY's 63.21%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
34.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PONY's 63.21%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above PONY's 44.40%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.