PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.16%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.23%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.18%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.16%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
97.16%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
97.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-368.11%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-368.11%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-368.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
168.86%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
168.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
168.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.