PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.56%
Revenue growth under 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
14.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
17.23%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.88%
Positive operating income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
13.85%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-17.05%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-17.05%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
34.70%
Share count expansion well above PONY's 4.32%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
34.70%
Diluted share count expanding well above PONY's 4.32%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
475.46%
OCF growth of 475.46% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
426.01%
FCF growth of 426.01% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-22.02%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-22.02%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.02%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
273.65%
OCF/share CAGR of 273.65% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
273.65%
OCF/share CAGR of 273.65% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
273.65%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 273.65% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
13.62%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
13.62%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
13.62%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.22%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.40%
Inventory growth of 7.40% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.31%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-18.91%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.55%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.