PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.16%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-2.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
1.42%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.83%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.83%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.33%
Negative OCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.95%
Negative FCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
55.97%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
55.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
55.97%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
555.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 555.17% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
555.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 555.17% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
555.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 555.17% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
130.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
130.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
130.48%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-50.69%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.63%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
9.95%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
21.88%
Debt growth far above PONY's 38.45%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.