PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.01%
Revenue growth under 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
13.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
9.68%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
15.44%
Positive operating income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.80%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.26%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.26%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-21.23%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-21.23%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-21.23%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
555.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 555.17% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
555.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 555.17% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
555.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 555.17% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
17.31%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
17.31%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
17.31%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.47%
Inventory growth of 80.47% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
7.27%
Asset growth above 1.5x PONY's 1.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.08%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
19.69%
Debt growth far above PONY's 38.45%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.