0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.75%
Positive operating income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.47%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.63%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
4.63%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.54%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
57.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
59.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1210.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 1210.34% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
1210.34%
OCF/share CAGR of 1210.34% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
1077.47%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 1077.47% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
138.06%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
138.06%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
77.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PONY's 63.21%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
42.68%
Inventory growth of 42.68% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
35.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x PONY's 1.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.05%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
9.48%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PONY's 38.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.