PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
45.70%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of PONY's 53.48%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
2.76%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-15.72%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.63%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-42.49%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-44.22%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-44.22%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-217.16%
Negative OCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-226.66%
Negative FCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
14.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
14.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.42%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-867.61%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-867.61%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-472.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-31.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-31.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-48.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.78%
Inventory growth of 33.78% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-9.23%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
7.68%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PONY's 38.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.