PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.59%
Revenue growth under 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
10.77%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
11.19%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
8.99%
Positive operating income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
2.96%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
3.05%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
3.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Dividend reduction while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
137.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
20.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-1635.22%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-1635.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-472.61%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
40.98%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PONY's 63.21%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
40.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PONY's 63.21%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-47.56%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.92%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.90%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
22.86%
Asset growth above 1.5x PONY's 1.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.75%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
55.56%
Debt growth far above PONY's 38.45%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.81%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.