PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.55%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PONY's 53.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
38.08%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of PONY's 49.53%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
22.49%
Positive EBIT growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
49.28%
Positive operating income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
40.65%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
40.50%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
40.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while PONY is at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
122.20%
OCF growth of 122.20% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
121.23%
FCF growth of 121.23% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
177.03%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
181.02%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
77.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
584.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 584.39% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
610.53%
OCF/share CAGR of 610.53% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
4.46%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 4.46% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
65.11%
Similar net income/share CAGR to PONY's 63.21%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
23.10%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-28.36%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.38%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.78%
AR growth well above PONY's 14.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-24.78%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
17.30%
Asset growth above 1.5x PONY's 1.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.98%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
32.21%
Debt growth far above PONY's 38.45%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.03%
SG&A growth well above PONY's 44.40%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.