PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.55%
Negative revenue growth while PONY stands at 53.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.22%
Negative gross profit growth while PONY is at 49.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-12.26%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-37.60%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-37.55%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-37.55%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PONY's 4.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.22%
Negative OCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.75%
Negative FCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-3.80%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-2.42%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
22.12%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
203.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 203.81% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
326.63%
OCF/share CAGR of 326.63% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-53.63%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-48.49%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-61.60%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-56.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.84%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-21.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-26.73%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-11.35%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.36%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
15.30%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PONY's 38.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.60%
We cut SG&A while PONY invests at 44.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.