PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.22%
Revenue growth under 50% of PONY's 53.48%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
9.63%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PONY's 49.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.96%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
23.57%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.48%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.00%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PONY's 4.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.89%
OCF growth of 78.89% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
83.21%
FCF growth of 83.21% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
106.29%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
4.63%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.94%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
987.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 987.00% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
505.43%
OCF/share CAGR of 505.43% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-17.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
27.31%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-52.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-46.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.39%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
15.35%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
AR growth well above PONY's 14.29%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-24.05%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.85%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.70%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-17.96%
We’re deleveraging while PONY stands at 38.45%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.16%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.