PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-34.77%
Negative revenue growth while PONY stands at 53.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-21.03%
Negative gross profit growth while PONY is at 49.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.81%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
16.51%
Positive net income growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.56%
Positive EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.56%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PONY is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.00%
Share reduction while PONY is at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.43%
Negative OCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-22.18%
Negative FCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-32.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-13.73%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-41.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
332.45%
OCF/share CAGR of 332.45% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
15.73%
OCF/share CAGR of 15.73% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
156.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 156.34% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-25.84%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-34.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
8.33%
Below 50% of PONY's 63.21%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.38%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
19.50%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-21.05%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
17.16%
Inventory growth of 17.16% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-21.04%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.20%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-38.98%
We’re deleveraging while PONY stands at 38.45%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.61%
We cut SG&A while PONY invests at 44.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.