PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of PONY's 53.48%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
-4.36%
Negative gross profit growth while PONY is at 49.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-93.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-92.97%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-92.97%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PONY's 4.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Dividend reduction while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
168.26%
OCF growth of 168.26% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
178.21%
FCF growth of 178.21% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
94.34%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PONY is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2219.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 2219.76% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
254.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 254.07% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
251.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 251.10% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-89.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.51%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-92.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
13.11%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-10.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
13.59%
Inventory growth of 13.59% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
10.10%
Asset growth above 1.5x PONY's 1.92%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.18%
Positive BV/share change while PONY is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.47%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PONY's 38.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.