PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-45.31%
Negative revenue growth while PONY stands at 53.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-27.69%
Negative gross profit growth while PONY is at 49.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.24%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-168.14%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-168.17%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-168.17%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.00%
Share reduction while PONY is at 4.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
234.80%
OCF growth of 234.80% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
234.11%
FCF growth of 234.11% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-80.43%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-81.30%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-84.60%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
546.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 546.56% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
10.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 10.14% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
411.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 411.16% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-115.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-132.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-244.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
9.09%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-2.06%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 132.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-9.76%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 132.50%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-46.13%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-59.01%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.50%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.06%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.22%
We’re deleveraging while PONY stands at 38.45%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PONY's 44.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.