PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while PONY stands at 53.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while PONY is at 49.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-106.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-105.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-105.88%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PONY's 4.32%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth of 325.75% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
335.95%
FCF growth of 335.95% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
-81.71%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-85.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-87.81%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
7.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 7.81% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-69.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-100.58%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-112.88%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 63.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
99.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PONY's 63.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
25.56%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-3.89%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 132.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
3.36%
Below 50% of PONY's 132.50%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
49.39%
Inventory growth of 49.39% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.11%
Asset growth at 50-75% of PONY's 1.92%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
-0.07%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
8.77%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PONY's 38.45%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A growth well above PONY's 44.40%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.