PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
169.78%
Revenue growth of 169.78% while PONY is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
155.92%
Gross profit growth of 155.92% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.38%
Negative operating income growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-22.27%
Negative net income growth while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while PONY is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.29%
Negative OCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-151.12%
Negative FCF growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-95.07%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-84.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-52.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-134.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-106.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-133.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-286.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-554.45%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-22938.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-40.61%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-41.53%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-42.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while PONY is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while PONY shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while PONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-13.28%
Negative asset growth while PONY invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-12.51%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
34.59%
Debt growth of 34.59% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
117.33%
R&D growth of 117.33% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
13.96%
SG&A growth of 13.96% while PONY is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.