0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.76%
Negative revenue growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
2.97%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 1.24%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.06%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
136.02%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 3.29%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
135.09%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
135.09%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
2.81%
Share change of 2.81% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
2.75%
Diluted share change of 2.75% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
2829.79%
Dividend growth of 2829.79% while Information Technology Services median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-472.46%
Negative OCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-449.59%
Negative FCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
18.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 10.60%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
3.24%
Below 50% of Information Technology Services median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
23.17%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 9.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-1171.24%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-39.56%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-452.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-97.91%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Information Technology Services median of 19.69%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-96.95%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 18.15%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-95.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 19.80%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 11.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
8.51%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Information Technology Services median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.69%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-57.17%
Dividend reductions while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
0.99%
AR growth of 0.99% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-19.74%
Decreasing inventory while Information Technology Services is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-7.06%
Assets shrink while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.52%
Negative BV/share change while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
17.00%
Debt growth of 17.00% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-16.72%
SG&A decline while Information Technology Services grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.