PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-35.05%
Negative revenue growth while Information Technology Services median is 3.70%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-57.37%
Negative gross profit growth while Information Technology Services median is 4.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12840.57%
Negative operating income growth while Information Technology Services median is 5.02%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-10932.16%
Negative net income growth while Information Technology Services median is 1.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11650.00%
Negative EPS growth while Information Technology Services median is 1.49%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-11650.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Information Technology Services median is 1.52%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.05%
Share reduction while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-145.25%
Negative OCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-147.96%
Negative FCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-88.24%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 28.03%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-90.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 19.70%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-86.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 13.75%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-124.41%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
81.82%
OCF/share CAGR of 81.82% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-118.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-162.72%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Information Technology Services median of 37.24%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-217.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 36.73%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-335.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 20.03%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
20.43%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 12.83% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-6.22%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 28.65%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-2.73%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 18.16%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.19%
AR shrinking while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-48.62%
Decreasing inventory while Information Technology Services is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-15.40%
Assets shrink while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-3.86%
Negative BV/share change while Information Technology Services median is 0.19%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-23.89%
Debt is shrinking while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-12.52%
SG&A decline while Information Technology Services grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.