PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
139.63%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-6.61%
Negative gross profit growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.29%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.23%
Operating income growth of 27.23% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
33.87%
Net income growth of 33.87% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
31.25%
EPS growth of 31.25% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
31.25%
Diluted EPS growth of 31.25% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-121.39%
Negative OCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-116.54%
Negative FCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-87.78%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 20.01%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-88.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 23.04%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-60.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 10.28%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
13.79%
OCF/share CAGR of 13.79% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
38.22%
OCF/share CAGR of 38.22% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-49.02%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-264.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Information Technology Services median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-5490.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 7.92%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-473.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-7.01%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-24.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 16.46%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-19.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 10.64%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
84.92%
AR growth of 84.92% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-0.29%
Decreasing inventory while Information Technology Services is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-10.95%
Assets shrink while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.95%
Negative BV/share change while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-36.45%
Debt is shrinking while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-22.46%
SG&A decline while Information Technology Services grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.