PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-36.92%
Negative revenue growth while Information Technology Services median is 1.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-28.71%
Negative gross profit growth while Information Technology Services median is 2.36%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
41.46%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
36.37%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
33.37%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Information Technology Services median of 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
34.60%
EPS growth of 34.60% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
34.60%
Diluted EPS growth of 34.60% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-0.00%
Share reduction while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.14%
Negative OCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-34.72%
Negative FCF growth while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-95.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 32.53%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-87.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 21.28%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-53.53%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 15.61%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-152.98%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
63.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 63.76% while Information Technology Services median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-298.63%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Information Technology Services median of 34.35%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-439.52%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 26.87%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-39.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Information Technology Services median is 12.50%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-46.65%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 19.12%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-47.97%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 19.81%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-45.59%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Information Technology Services median is 13.77%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Information Technology Services median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.45%
Assets shrink while Information Technology Services median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-9.52%
Negative BV/share change while Information Technology Services median is 0.42%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-20.31%
Debt is shrinking while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-69.33%
R&D dropping while Information Technology Services median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-29.69%
SG&A decline while Information Technology Services grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.