PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.72%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 3.44%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-76.02%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-56.61%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-38.79%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-32.02%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-32.52%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-32.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-94.79%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 28.38%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-72.16%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.66%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-8.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 100.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-312.21%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 47.62%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-557.81%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 44.51%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
20.57%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
-55.77%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 42.97%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-54.84%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 27.24%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-48.30%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.58%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.48%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.61%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.92%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.38%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-34.53%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
97.32%
R&D growth of 97.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
3.37%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.