PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.45%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.08%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-4.36%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.34%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-93.02%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-92.97%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-92.97%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.02%
Share change of 0.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.87%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
168.26%
OCF growth of 168.26% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
178.21%
FCF growth of 178.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
94.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.29%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
24.60%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-18.27%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 10.03%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
2219.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 2219.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
254.07%
OCF/share CAGR of 254.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
251.10%
3Y OCF/share growth of 251.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-89.65%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 11.87%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-95.51%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-92.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 5.85%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
13.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.57%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-10.21%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
13.59%
Inventory growth of 13.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
10.10%
Asset growth of 10.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.18%
BV/share growth of 0.18% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
1.47%
Debt growth of 1.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.99%
SG&A growth of 21.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.