0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-45.31%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-27.69%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.72%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-176.24%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-168.14%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-168.17%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-168.17%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.00%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
234.80%
OCF growth of 234.80% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
234.11%
FCF growth of 234.11% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-80.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 31.41%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-81.30%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 15.65%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-84.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 11.76%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
546.56%
OCF/share CAGR of 546.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
10.14%
OCF/share CAGR of 10.14% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
411.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 411.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-115.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 2.97%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-132.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.90%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-244.87%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
9.09%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
-2.06%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 18.16%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-9.76%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 13.96%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-46.13%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-59.01%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-7.50%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.06%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-5.22%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.73%
SG&A growth of 6.73% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.