PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.40%
Revenue growth of 31.40% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-10.09%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
138.46%
Operating income growth of 138.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
151.67%
Net income growth of 151.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
151.78%
EPS growth of 151.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
151.78%
Diluted EPS growth of 151.78% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.01%
Share change of 0.01% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.14%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-86.89%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-67.50%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 9.83%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-62.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 6.20%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-78.61%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-77.79%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-80.81%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
107.75%
3Y OCF/share growth of 107.75% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-90.66%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-85.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
408.55%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 408.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
35.33%
Equity/share CAGR of 35.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-3.60%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-5.94%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 2.38%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
7.33%
AR growth of 7.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-41.82%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.13%
Asset growth of 3.13% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
0.62%
BV/share growth of 0.62% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-65.57%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-26.11%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.