PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-43.71%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 5.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-6.71%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 5.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.48%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-106.29%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-105.88%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-105.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
325.75%
OCF growth of 325.75% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
335.95%
FCF growth of 335.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-81.71%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 16.70%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-85.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 13.85%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-87.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 6.78%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
7.81%
OCF/share CAGR of 7.81% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-69.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-80.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-100.58%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 18.89%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-112.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 24.07%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
99.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
25.56%
Equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
-3.89%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 22.92%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
3.36%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.04%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
49.39%
Inventory growth of 49.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.11%
Asset growth near Technology median. Charlie Munger attributes it to a typical industry cycle of capital investment.
-0.07%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.93%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
8.77%
Debt growth of 8.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.31%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.