Futong Technology Development Holdings Limited (0465.HK)

Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.

Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.26%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.22%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.

Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.

Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.

Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.

Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.

Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 24.95%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.64%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 10.59%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 23.40%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 32.53%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.21%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.68%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.47%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.

Dividend declines over 10 years while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.

Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.

Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.

Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.

Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.

Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.