PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
169.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.15%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
155.92%
Gross profit growth of 155.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.38%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-22.27%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.00%
Share change of 0.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.29%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-151.12%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-95.07%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 28.92%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-84.27%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.02%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-52.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 15.68%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-134.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-106.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-133.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-286.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 20.83%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-554.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 10.62%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-22938.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 4.09%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
-40.61%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 42.22%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-41.53%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 23.74%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-42.11%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 14.75%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-100.00%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-13.28%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-12.51%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
34.59%
Debt growth of 34.59% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
117.33%
R&D growth of 117.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
13.96%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.