PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-49.38%
Revenue decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-49.98%
Cost reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-41.91%
Gross profit decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
14.76%
Margin change of 14.76% while 8198.HK shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.82%
G&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-47.80%
Marketing expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
86.20%
Other expenses change of 86.20% while 8198.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-39.58%
Operating expenses reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-49.55%
Total costs reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-59.76%
Interest expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-39.18%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-44.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.97%
EBITDA margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.57%
Operating income decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.51%
Margin change of 9.51% while 8198.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
59.65%
Other expenses change of 59.65% while 8198.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-34.90%
Pre-tax income decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.61%
Margin change of 28.61% while 8198.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-77.12%
Tax expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.13%
Net income decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
36.06%
Margin change of 36.06% while 8198.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-32.88%
EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.88%
Diluted EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.69%
Share count change of 2.69% while 8198.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
2.69%
Diluted share change of 2.69% while 8198.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.