PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
45.70%
Positive growth while 8198.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
50.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 33.35%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.76%
Positive growth while 8198.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-29.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.06%
G&A change of 17.06% while 8198.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
11.33%
Marketing expense change of 11.33% while 8198.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
85.86%
Other expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
19.74%
Operating expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 17.77%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.99%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 24.61%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
29.04%
D&A growth while 8198.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.45%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.63%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.21%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-35.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-42.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.