PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.51%
Revenue decline while 8198.HK shows 93.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.55%
Cost reduction while 8198.HK shows 90.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.00%
Gross profit decline while 8198.HK shows 110.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.62%
Margin expansion below 50% of 8198.HK's 8.62%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.09%
G&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-13.89%
Marketing expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.39%
Total costs reduction while 8198.HK shows 31.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.00%
Interest expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 1.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.95%
D&A growth while 8198.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.52%
EBITDA decline while 8198.HK shows 130.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.40%
EBITDA margin decline while 8198.HK shows 115.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.81%
Operating income decline while 8198.HK shows 116.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.14%
Operating margin decline while 8198.HK shows 108.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.40%
Other expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.26%
Pre-tax income decline while 8198.HK shows 78.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of 8198.HK's 88.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.29%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8198.HK's 103.45%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-16.73%
Net income decline while 8198.HK shows 66.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.26%
Net margin decline while 8198.HK shows 82.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.72%
EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 60.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.72%
Diluted EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 60.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.00%
Share count increase while 8198.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.