PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.85%
Positive growth while 8198.HK shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
22.97%
Cost increase while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-13.84%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.11%
Margin decline while 8198.HK shows 15.89% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.29%
G&A change of 40.29% while 8198.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
24.53%
Marketing expense change of 24.53% while 8198.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.14%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8198.HK's 226.05%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
22.20%
Total costs growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.10%
D&A growth while 8198.HK reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-56.43%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-63.65%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-59.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-66.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.66%
Other expenses growth less than half of 8198.HK's 226.61%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-102.73%
Pre-tax income decline while 8198.HK shows 22.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-102.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.60%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-108.82%
Net income decline while 8198.HK shows 432.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-107.36%
Net margin decline while 8198.HK shows 970.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.50%
EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 431.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-109.50%
Diluted EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 431.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
Share count reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-7.18%
Diluted share reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.