PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.76%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-3.14%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
2.97%
Positive growth while 8198.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.90%
Margin expansion below 50% of 8198.HK's 1141.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-15.27%
G&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 147.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-17.26%
Marketing expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.33%
Operating expenses reduction while 8198.HK shows 183.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.31%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.41%
D&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 33.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
57.26%
EBITDA growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.73%
EBITDA margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.06%
Operating income growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.92%
Operating margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-42.13%
Other expenses reduction while 8198.HK shows 177.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
701.00%
Pre-tax income growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
718.09%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
140.95%
Tax expense growth less than half of 8198.HK's 1771.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
136.02%
Net income growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
137.05%
Net margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
135.09%
EPS growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
135.09%
Diluted EPS growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.81%
Share count increase while 8198.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.75%
Diluted share increase while 8198.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.