0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.39%
Revenue decline while 8198.HK shows 339.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.88%
Cost reduction while 8198.HK shows 341.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.05%
Gross profit decline while 8198.HK shows 335.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.30%
Margin expansion while 8198.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-34.15%
G&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 78.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-9.59%
Marketing expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 290.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.49%
Operating expenses reduction while 8198.HK shows 79.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.18%
Total costs reduction while 8198.HK shows 103.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.87%
D&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 439.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-46.58%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.73%
EBITDA margin decline while 8198.HK shows 56.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.92%
Operating margin decline while 8198.HK shows 66.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
110.09%
Other expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.50%
Pre-tax income growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
55.68%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to 8198.HK's 55.14%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
274.83%
Tax expense growth while 8198.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.70%
Net margin growth below 50% of 8198.HK's 55.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-10.80%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.80%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.83%
Share count reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.40% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.