PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-45.31%
Revenue decline while 8198.HK shows 151.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-47.81%
Cost reduction while 8198.HK shows 279.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-27.69%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
32.21%
Margin expansion while 8198.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.83%
G&A growth 1.25-1.5x 8198.HK's 25.31%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize overhead control.
-6.15%
Marketing expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 64.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.05%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8198.HK's 26.54%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-42.16%
Total costs reduction while 8198.HK shows 143.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.38%
D&A reduction while 8198.HK shows 3259.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-156.97%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-204.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-176.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-239.41%
Operating margin decline while 8198.HK shows 14.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
126.34%
Other expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-145.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-183.61%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-91.46%
Tax expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 96.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-168.14%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-224.58%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.17%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-168.17%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.