PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-35.05%
Revenue decline while 8198.HK shows 31.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.93%
Cost reduction while 8198.HK shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-57.37%
Gross profit decline while 8198.HK shows 117.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-34.36%
Margin decline while 8198.HK shows 113.57% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 8198.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.86%
G&A growth less than half of 8198.HK's 45.09%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
-18.54%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.33%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8198.HK's 44.89%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-23.94%
Total costs reduction while 8198.HK shows 15.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4049.21%
D&A growth above 1.5x 8198.HK's 174.13%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-8971.27%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13757.89%
EBITDA margin decline while 8198.HK shows 4.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12840.57%
Operating income decline while 8198.HK shows 35.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19714.91%
Operating margin decline while 8198.HK shows 51.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
118.11%
Other expenses growth while 8198.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1106.15%
Pre-tax income decline while 8198.HK shows 36.81% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1649.03%
Pre-tax margin decline while 8198.HK shows 51.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-75.18%
Tax expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 88.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10932.16%
Net income decline while 8198.HK shows 16.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16884.71%
Net margin decline while 8198.HK shows 36.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11650.00%
EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 27.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11650.00%
Diluted EPS decline while 8198.HK shows 27.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.05%
Share count reduction while 8198.HK shows 15.39% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.