0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
169.78%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 8198.HK's 107.02%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
172.74%
Cost growth 50-75% of 8198.HK's 335.86%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
155.92%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 8198.HK's 37.53%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-5.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
117.33%
R&D change of 117.33% while 8198.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
26.07%
Similar G&A growth to 8198.HK's 28.78%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry cost structures.
7.33%
Marketing expense change of 7.33% while 8198.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.07%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 8198.HK's 284.46%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
81.33%
Total costs growth less than half of 8198.HK's 293.46%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-181.64%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-62.93%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
39.61%
EBITDA margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
58.72%
Operating margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-116.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.70%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
55.26%
Pre-tax margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-70.94%
Tax expense reduction while 8198.HK shows 108.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.27%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
54.68%
Net margin growth while 8198.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.00%
Share count increase while 8198.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.