PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-49.38%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 6.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-49.98%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-41.91%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 6.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
14.76%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.82%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-47.80%
Marketing expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
86.20%
Other expenses change of 86.20% while 9698.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-39.58%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-49.55%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 5.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-59.76%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-39.18%
D&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 0.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-44.34%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.97%
EBITDA margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-44.57%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 13.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.51%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x 9698.HK's 6.58%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
59.65%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-34.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
28.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-77.12%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-31.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.06%
Net margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-32.88%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.88%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.69%
Share count increase while 9698.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.69%
Diluted share increase while 9698.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.