PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
45.70%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
50.63%
Cost growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.76%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 9698.HK's 6.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-29.47%
Margin decline while 9698.HK shows 0.31% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.06%
G&A growth while 9698.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
11.33%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 3.70%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
85.86%
Other expenses change of 85.86% while 9698.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
19.74%
Operating expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
48.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 5.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
42.99%
Interest expense growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.04%
D&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-10.45%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.63%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 13.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-42.78%
Operating margin decline while 9698.HK shows 6.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.21%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-35.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-56.06%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.13%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-42.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.22%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.