0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.51%
Revenue decline while 9698.HK shows 6.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-16.55%
Cost reduction while 9698.HK shows 6.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-16.00%
Gross profit decline while 9698.HK shows 6.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.62%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.09%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-13.89%
Marketing expense reduction while 9698.HK shows 3.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
50.00%
Other expenses change of 50.00% while 9698.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-13.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-16.39%
Total costs reduction while 9698.HK shows 5.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.95%
D&A growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-23.52%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.40%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.81%
Operating income decline while 9698.HK shows 13.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.14%
Operating margin decline while 9698.HK shows 6.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.40%
Other expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-13.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.89%
Pre-tax margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.29%
Tax expense growth while 9698.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.73%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.72%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.72%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.00%
Share count increase while 9698.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.