0.34 - 0.34
0.23 - 0.41
110.0K / 51.2K (Avg.)
-1.33 | -0.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.55%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.50%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
39.68%
Cost growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
38.08%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 6.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.05%
Margin decline while 9698.HK shows 0.31% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.18%
G&A growth while 9698.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
32.25%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 3.70%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
77.43%
Other expenses change of 77.43% while 9698.HK maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
39.58%
Operating expenses growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
39.67%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 9698.HK's 5.42%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
8.38%
Interest expense growth while 9698.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.24%
D&A reduction while 9698.HK shows 0.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
43.25%
EBITDA growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.65%
EBITDA margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.28%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x 9698.HK's 13.51%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.97%
Similar operating margin growth to 9698.HK's 6.58%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-75.73%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.57%
Pre-tax income growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.43%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-23.47%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
40.65%
Net income growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.79%
Net margin growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.50%
EPS growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.50%
Diluted EPS growth while 9698.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.